Restricted (restricted
because limited information is given to/known by the reader)
- Words are predictable, standard language that is used on a day to day basis.
- Vocabulary is limited and often habitual.
- Often used between people that share identifications.
- People can understand without a full explanation.
Elaborated (elaborated
because it’s giving more information)
- A wider vocabulary is used.
- Language is explained and contextualised.
Comparisons
Mirror: Bloodbath on the high
street: Three major chains announce 6,000 jobs cuts in one morning- https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/bloodbath-high-street-bloodbath-high-12102203
I will be discussing the difference between two articles by
investigating multiple aspects of each. The articles I have investigated are
from BBC News and The Mirror and both concern Toy R Us UK going into
administration.
Headlines are a very important part of the article as it can
heavily contribute to whether a user clicks/ decides to read an article. These
headlines in particular were interesting to read. The BBC went for a simple
headline that didn’t give too much information on the topic at hand, instead
relying on the fact that you’ll click the article and find out there. Due to
its lack of explanation we can say it’s restrictive, especially with its use of
the word “administration”. Here, the writer of the article is assuming that
everyone who reads the article understands what the word ‘administration’. This
is probably because the majority readership of the BBC News business section is
those labelled ABC1 socio-economically. Therefore, the writer feels as if the
word needs no explanation. In the Mirror, the headline is a lot more
elaborated, stating that there has been “6,000 job cuts”. Here they get
straight to the point and do not hide what has happened underneath a word that
their C2DE target audience may not understand. The headline they use is also a
lot more sensationalist, using the word “bloodbath” as an adjective to describe
the situation, this connotes chaos to the reader.
In the Mirror, the adjective “major” is used. This emphasises the
size of the companies involved which in turn makes the subject of the article
seem more important than it actually may be. This is used to shock the reader,
implying that even the large companies are struggling at the moment. This is an
example of a noun used by the Mirror to make their story more appealing to the
reader. The BBC on the other hand did not rely on descriptive language as much,
and went for a more statistical approach. At one point it is wrote that “26
stores will close this spring”. This informs the user with more details about
the topic, “26 stores will close this spring”. This informs the user with more
details about the topic, rather than glorifying it using interesting adjectives
and nouns.
Both articles have small paragraphs that are clear and easy to
read, this is because it’s a common convention of news reporting to have one
sentence per paragraph, however the BBC does sometimes use two. This again
could be because of the BBC’s socio-economically higher target audience, as it
may be presumed that they can concentrate more on/are used to reading larger
paragraphs. This is important because if the article was written too simply for
those of a higher NRS grade, they may feel patronised and become bored of what
they’re reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment